Thursday, 31 January 2013

To what extent do V for Vendetta & Children of Men conform to film stereotypes and what messages are behind these representations?


To what extent do V for Vendetta & Children of Men conform to film stereotypes and what messages are behind these representations?

The two films that I am studying both do conform to film stereotypes to an extent however they both have aspects that go against these traditional stereotypes which I will be exploring throughout the essay. However the film V for Vendetta appears to conform to these stereotypes to a greater extent than that which Children of Men does.

Both films follow the typical ‘horror’ characteristic of having a ‘final girl’ despite both being hybrid genre sci-fi thriller films. In V for Vendetta the final girl is the character of Evie, although she does fit many of the guidelines of a final girl she does differ in some ways. Evie reaches the end of the film and achieves her goal due to being smart, and through masculating herself. This is a common characteristic of how final girls reach the end of films and how we know that they are the stereotype of a final girl. Evie however achieves her objective through well planned out efforts and a strategy which does not conform to the stereotype which is that final girls normally defeat the final obstacle they face by accident or by some streak of luck. This shows that much like the genre of the film Evie is a hybrid of the final girl stereotype, she has lost her girlish characteristics and achieves her goals through planning but does survive to the end as the last significant female making her fit into the stereotype nonetheless. The film Children of Men however does not have this stereotype of a final girl, despite Kee surviving to the end of the film she does not do it through any of her own actions, the only reason she reaches her destination and survives the problems she faces throughout the film is through the actions of a male (Theo) and sacrifices others have made for her. She survives through to the end but does not meet any of the physical or mental stereotypes of a final girl so I do not feel that she should be placed into this category showing that the film Children of Men does not follow the common stereotype of genre of a final girl, and does so to convey the message that although women are necessary to keep the world going they need men to help them reach this goal and outcome.

The next stereotype i will focus on is that of a hypermasculine protagonist. The film V for Vendetta immediately meets this stereotype through the character of V. The character possesses super human speed and strength which immediately shows him as a hypermasculine alpha male. And scene which displays this to the greatest extent is in the conclusion of the film where V fights multiple soldiers in the underground and kills them all whilst being repeatedly shot at. This demonstration of his power shows his hypermasculine characteristics and representation perfectly meeting the traditional stereotype of a hypermasculine protagonist. You can also read into this in a psychosexual way as V uses large knives to repeatedly penetrate his enemies to show his dominance over them, this again supports the idea of him being hypermasculine as i shows his superiority as an alpha male. V for vendetta also turns the stereotypical female character of Evie into a hypermasculinised heroine who completes Vs Vendetta. When she becomes masculinised Evie loses her fear and also her hair, masculinising her personality and physical appearance. The way that both protagonists fit the hypermasculine stereotype conveys the message that only males can complete the important actions in the world, and gives the idea that women almost need to change and become like males to make an impact on the world. This message can be interpretated differently but that is how i personally read into the film. Children of Men however has no predominant hypermasculinised characters to fit into the stereotype, the only characters that i felt portrayed these characteristics were the revolutionary group ‘The Fishes’ during the scene in which they chase Theo and Kee as they try to escape. The fishes however are robbed of this hypermasculinity when they display feminine traits during the scene in which Kee is wandering through the battle ground with her baby and all fighting hold a ceasefire. This stop in fighting and consideration is a feminine trait of weakness which would not be portrayed by a hypermasculinised character. This leads me to the conclusion that V for Vendetta conforms to the stereotypes of a Hypermasculine protagonist whilst Children of Men does not conform to any extent.

The next main stereotype is that of a positive British National Identity. As a Hollywood film it is to be expected that even though it is dystopian V for Vendetta will still present Britain in a more tourist appealing attractive way than the film Children of Men will. V for Vendetta shows all the iconic locations of Britain such as the houses of parliament and the old Bailey, despite being a dystopian film we see very little evidence of this in the physicality’s of the buildings and locations in which the film is set. The majority of characters in the film are very well spoken in a typical British accent showing that the film follows these stereotypes of the British national identity. However the film has a totalitarian government with strong Nazi symbolism which goes against any stereotypes and traditional representations of the British. This is put in the film to show the dystopian theme of the film and means that the film cannot fully conform to the typical Representation of the British national identity so only meets the stereotype to a certain extent. The film Children of Men again goes against stereotypes and does not follow any stereotypes of British National Identity other than the accents which all of the English characters throughout the film possess. These are none of Britain’s typical tourist attractions shown and the country is presented in a negative light so would cause no desire for potential tourists watching the film to visit. I feel that the film goes against these stereotypes because it is a British made film rather than a Hollywood made film so it has no influences or pressures from outside sources to include a positive presentation of any aspects or buildings of the British.

In conclusion V for Vendetta conforms to the stereotypes of Characters and British National Identity to a much higher extent than children of men does. I feel that it does this because it is a Hollywood film so follows more typical conventions to attract a wider audience unlike the film children of men which was a British film and therefore aimed to give a truer representation of Britain and what the future holds rather than to simply create as much money as possible for those involved.

Thursday, 24 January 2013

We Need to Talk About Kevin Sequel, Scene Idea.

We Need to Talk About Kevin Sequel Idea,
Jail Corridor Scene


- Kevin's in jail walking down corridor with a female guard
- Acts seemingly friendly to the female guard, laughing/joking with her
- Trips up the guard so that she falls onto her face
- Kevin smiles while the woman cannot see showing that tripping her up was his true intention
- Women stands up with nose bleed and Kevin acts sympathetic, showing that he is a liar and acts to deceive those around him
- When they reach Kevins cell he is locked in, the guard says bye and rushes off to clean up her nose
- Kevin smiles to himself and laughs when she is out of earshot, he is obviously gleeful with what he accomplished


- This scene shows that the character of Kevin has not changed since going into jail after committing the murders
- Kevin is again shown as demonised as he was in the original film, tying in with my study of the representation of youth
- Shows that some characters will never change, wherever they are placed and whatever happens to them
- Shows the true cruelty of Kevin as a character has not changed since the original, shows he has no cause or reason for his evil actions as he carries them out on a guard who is trying to be nice to him and be his friend in prison


- Only character in the scene that was present in the original film that carries over to this scene in the sequel is Kevin himself
- Only set 1 year on from original film
- Kevin's face has predominant bruising and scarring, viewer will work out it was caused by beatings administered by other inmates


- Set in a prison corridor
- Jail Cell
- Grey walls all indoors
- Nothing in corridor other than lights on ceiling
- Cold lifeless feel
- Harsh overly bright lighting, creates tense atmosphere

Elevator Pitch




This is my Elevator Pitch for my scene idea, see the post titled "We Need to Talk About Kevin Sequel" to see a detailed explanation of the scene and how it ties in with my MACRO study from my textual analysis essay.

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Mock Exam Homework

How do the films you have studied relate to the concept of genre and narrative?

The two films that i have studied are Children of Men and V for
Vendetta. Both of these have complex narratives and do not follow
simple conventions of genre. The film V however appears to have a much
more complex narrative than that of Children of Men.

Firstly i will start with the genre of these two films, both of the
two films which i study come under the classification of 'Hybrid
Genres'. This means that they are not simply one genre, for example
they are not simply horror or comedy. They are a mix of two or more
genres. This is made necessary in the films by them being set in the
future, meaning in most cases whatever original genre they had fallen
under a sci-fi aspect would have been included making them a hybrid
genre. Both of the two films are a mix of the thriller and sci-fi
genres. i will start off by looking at Children of Men. the film
follows the typical genre stereotypes of a thriller as a great amount
of suspense and mystery are created throughout the plot, the sci-fi
aspect of this film however comes as it is set in 2027. It is only a
subtle hint at sic-fi but giant electronic billboards are on street
corners along with computerized images on the sides of buses. This
more technical presence in the Mise-en-Scene makes it somewhat more
believable that humans are no longer able to re-create as even without
the presence of any 'robots' an impression is given to the modern day
viewer that technology is overtaking everything.

The same mix of Thriller and Sci-Fi is used in the other film of study
V for Vendetta. However V for Vendetta has a bigger Sci-Fi influence
than that which is shown in Children of Men. V for Vendetta uses the
same giant electronic billboards, but it also has the main protagonist
of V who possesses a sort of super power due to his heightened
abilities. During the film these abilities were acquired through V
being tested on in the Lark Hill concentration camp, showing the film
to be sci-fi as it follows the common genre convention that genetic
alterations came about by accident as a result of some form of
scientific experiment. In V however the Sci-Fi elements in the
Mise-en-Scene are still very small, this is to keep the idea in the
audiences mind that this is not a far off future, and they should be
worried about it. V has a stronger presence of the sci--fi genre than
Children of Men as it originated as a comic and comics frequently
contain strong sci-fi ideas.

These two films both use hybrid genres to maintain the interest of the
audience. As both films are Dystopian and set in the near future the
sci-fi elements must be kept to a minimum to maintain their
believability as a key feature of these two films is that it shows the
audience what their lives could be like very soon if the human race
carries on as it is. Some technological advances must be shown to
distinguish that it is the future but robots etc would be too far as
it takes away all the threat of the Dystopian near future ideas
presented in the two films. Single genre films have also already
covered almost every possible storyline in the past so a hybrid genre
must be created and used so that new ideas can be used and presented
in the best possible way in the films.

The two films again share a similarity in that they both have complex
narratives, this is to be expected to as they both fall partly under
the thriller genre. i feel however that Children of Men although
having a complex plot line follows many of the conventions of The
Classic Hollywood Narrative. By this i mean that the film has a clear
beginning, middle and end in the plot line (following a 3 act
structure) but also that it has the protagonist face a problem and
overcome it to allow the film to end with a happy positive resolution.
This happens almost completely in Children of Men as as soon as Theo
is introduced to Kee you know that he will safely deliver her to the
destination she needs to reach, there is no question about whether she
will make it. The only point in my opinion that challenges this
classic Hollywood narrative is Theo's' death at the end of the film,
this does not allow for a completely happy ending as you would expect
but at this point he has completed his duty and allowed the film to
reach a positive resolution so it does still follow the conventions
very closely. The film clearly follows the 3 act structure without any
deviation from it.

V for Vendetta however whilst also reaching a positive resolution and
having the main character die to achieve his goal in the same way,
does not follow the classic Hollywood narrative. it does not follow
this narrative style as V is not presented with a problem, instead he
creates his own agenda and imposes it onto others. the mystery that
surrounds V makes it very hard for the film to film into the classic
Hollywood narrative as we do not fully know what kind of character he
is until he has completed all of his private agendas and eventually
dies so that Evie who he 'set free' can complete his work. V for
Vendetta uses many flashbacks throughout the film to show what has
happened in the past or to create mystery around certain characters.
This is unlike Children of Men where it is all shown in present time
so there is no confusion or mystery as to what is going on in the
plot. Overall the film V for Vendetta does follow the 3 act structure
that defines the Classic Hollywood Narrative but through its use of
flashbacks and its complex character driven plot it deviates enough so
that i do not class the narrative as 'Classic Hollywood'.

In conclusion both of the two films use hybrid genres to allow them to
be near future Dystopian films and also so that they remain
interesting and fresh to the audiences who view them. V for Vendetta
has a much more complex narrative not following any guidelines whereas
Children of Men follows the Classic Hollywood Narrative very closely
making it a simpler film to understand, predict and watch.