Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Friday, 14 December 2012
Friday, 7 December 2012
Children of Men Characters
Theo Faron.
- Protagonist of the film
- Theo is met by terrorist group
- He has lost all hope for human kind until he becomes the unexpected guardian of Kee
- When he finds out the activists intend to kill Kee and use her baby as a weapon he becomes her protector
- He goes from a man who goes through his life ignoring all around him to being a hero and a protector
- Theo dies in the final scene after getting Kee safely into the rowboat
Jasper.
- Jasper is an old friend of the protagonist Theo
- He makes many references to Theos past, showing the strength in their relationship
- Is the reminiscent of the old 1960s hippies, despite the dreary future for human kind he keeps optimistic and happy
- Lives with his disabled wife in an isolated house in a forest
- Shows Jasper doesn't want to be part of the modern civilisation
- Grows marijuana, shows again that he dislikes conformity
- Dies whilst helping Theo and Kee to escape
Kee.
- Only woman to become pregnant in the last 18 years
- She follows Theo as the second main character
- She represents the hope of the earth
- We follow her pregnancy and the birth of her child
- She moves the story future as once we meet Kee we desire for her to be kept safe and protected
- She is a symbol for the whole of humanity in the film
- Film ends with her floating into the fog alongside a dead Theo in the rowboat
Julian Taylor.
- Leader of activist group 'The Fishes'
- Ex-wife of Theo
- Entrusts Theo with Kee and sets him on his journey
Luke.
- Co-leader of The Fishes
- Dislikes the governments branding of The Fishes as a terrorist organization so stages the death of Julian
- Plans to use Kee as a tool for his own goals
Miriam.
- A member of The Fishes
- Is the comforter and carer of Kee
- Gives her own life so that Kee and the baby will be safe
Syd.
- Is an old friend of Jaspers and a soldier at the Bexhill Refugee Camp
- He has no allegiance to anybody and acts purely on his own will
- Is a dangerous character
Marikha.
- A gypsy woman from the refugee camp
- Speaks no English
- Is introduced to Theo and Kee by Syd
- Becomes their guardian and guide through the refugee camp
- Is reliable and helps Theo and Kee survive
- Protagonist of the film
- Theo is met by terrorist group
- He has lost all hope for human kind until he becomes the unexpected guardian of Kee
- When he finds out the activists intend to kill Kee and use her baby as a weapon he becomes her protector
- He goes from a man who goes through his life ignoring all around him to being a hero and a protector
- Theo dies in the final scene after getting Kee safely into the rowboat
Jasper.
- Jasper is an old friend of the protagonist Theo
- He makes many references to Theos past, showing the strength in their relationship
- Is the reminiscent of the old 1960s hippies, despite the dreary future for human kind he keeps optimistic and happy
- Lives with his disabled wife in an isolated house in a forest
- Shows Jasper doesn't want to be part of the modern civilisation
- Grows marijuana, shows again that he dislikes conformity
- Dies whilst helping Theo and Kee to escape
Kee.
- Only woman to become pregnant in the last 18 years
- She follows Theo as the second main character
- She represents the hope of the earth
- We follow her pregnancy and the birth of her child
- She moves the story future as once we meet Kee we desire for her to be kept safe and protected
- She is a symbol for the whole of humanity in the film
- Film ends with her floating into the fog alongside a dead Theo in the rowboat
Julian Taylor.
- Leader of activist group 'The Fishes'
- Ex-wife of Theo
- Entrusts Theo with Kee and sets him on his journey
Luke.
- Co-leader of The Fishes
- Dislikes the governments branding of The Fishes as a terrorist organization so stages the death of Julian
- Plans to use Kee as a tool for his own goals
Miriam.
- A member of The Fishes
- Is the comforter and carer of Kee
- Gives her own life so that Kee and the baby will be safe
Syd.
- Is an old friend of Jaspers and a soldier at the Bexhill Refugee Camp
- He has no allegiance to anybody and acts purely on his own will
- Is a dangerous character
Marikha.
- A gypsy woman from the refugee camp
- Speaks no English
- Is introduced to Theo and Kee by Syd
- Becomes their guardian and guide through the refugee camp
- Is reliable and helps Theo and Kee survive
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Thursday, 15 November 2012
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
Children of Men, Key Messages and Ideas. Mindmap and Moodboard.
Children of Men.
Key Messages and Ideas.
-The
film gives the messages of hope and faith, through the way some hold
out belief for 'The Human Project' which is that one day the humans will
reproduce again
-The
ideas behind this are that the people are being punished by a divine
being, or the way they have destroyed and changed their world has dmaged them so they are no longer able to reproduce
-It gives the idea that this infertility is their own doing and their own fault
-This gives the film a message of punishment, that they are being punished for what they have done
-The gives messages of fear/oppression and what happens when these are at their extremes
-The way the refugees are "hunted down like cockroaches" shows a link to almost the holocaust
-It shows that people will always resort back to treating others unequally if they think it helps what they believe in
-This also gives the film a very anti-government message, as the people no longer agree with the governments ideals
-It
also gives the idea that humans always need somebody else to blame
other than ourselves, this is shown in the disgusting treatment of the
refugees in the film. It shows that the governments almost make them
scape goats so that the people of Britain have someone to blame other
than themselves
-The film touches on messages of religion, the journey of theo and
Kee can be linked to a modern day Mary and Joseph
-Their journey shows a future struggle to try and bring a 'saviour child' into the world
-The child is the first bit of hope for 19 years much like Jesus was hope for everybody when he died for our sins
-When
me and her baby are discovered by others they respond with "Jesus
Christ" and the sign of the cross this shows that they are eager for
someone to believe in and that they see the baby as they saviour.
Key Scenes.
-The
scene at the end where Theo and Kee are moving through the refugee camp
and all fighting stops and people bow out the way to let them past.
Shows that all are united in hope for the future.
-To
demonstrate fear and oppression I have chosen the scene where the
refugees are in cages at the train station, all the people on the
platform walk past them without so much as a glance showing that it is
what they are accustomed too and no longer shocks them. The fact an old
women is begging and being ignored shows the oppression as the
government have no care for anybody other than their own people at all.
-There
is a strong idea and belief on the corruption of dreams, this is sown
in the scene where Theo arrives at the house and first meets Kee. He
discovers that the activists intend to steal the baby and kill Kee once
it is born to use it as a weapon. This shows that although they are glad
for the arrival of the baby they want to use it for a personal gain as
it is a bargaining tool that nobody else in the world possesses.
Sunday, 11 November 2012
Friday, 12 October 2012
Friday, 5 October 2012
Wednesday, 3 October 2012
V for Vendetta, Use of Juxtaposition in the Domino Montage
The domino montage in v for vendetta is one of the best examples of juxtaposition in any film I have seen, it takes unrelated incidents of what V is doing with the dominos and what is happening in the world and puts them side by side. Cutting between the two effectively to make us form a link between the two. At the start of the clip it shows V placing the first domino
and then switches to a shot of parcel delivery lorries driving, the lorries contain the boxes full of the masks that V wears. This is juxtaposition as this is the first part of Vs scheme which is like the first domino. The shot then goes to a man wearing the mask robbing a shop, before switching to the government officials discussing the topic one of them says "this is exactly what he wants" before the shot cuts back to the man in the shop who says "anarchy in the UK". these two events are unrelated but by
putting them side by side it makes it feel as if the robber is ending the sentence of the government official. the next main use is when the official is speaking of his trip to lark hill, he says "it was as if i could see the whole thing, one long chain of events" the shot then goes to V with many many dominos layed out, showing that one thing has led to another and being a physical representation of the long chain of events that had just been mentioned in the narrative.
"it was like a perfect pattern layed out in front of me, and i realised that we are all part of it"
is a quotation taken from the montage. the quote is spoken over the top of a shot of Vs dominos showing juxtaposition between the narrative and the dominos. there is no link between the two but we start to see the dominos as the perfect pattern and we make the link that every domino must fall for them to work linking it too the "we are all part of it" piece of the quotation.
"someone will do something stupid" is spoken by the official as the shot changes to a police officer shoots a young girl in a V mask. This makes us see the stupid act he just predicted as this shooting. "and then" is the last dialogue used before V is seen flicking over the dominos, this makes us feel that V is in control and has the power. the shots then switch between riots in the city and Vs dominos falling.
this is the most impressive use of juxtaposition as the two scenes are completely unrelated yet we start to see them as representative of each other. the dominos falling, being representative of the order falling and anarchy taking over.
and then switches to a shot of parcel delivery lorries driving, the lorries contain the boxes full of the masks that V wears. This is juxtaposition as this is the first part of Vs scheme which is like the first domino. The shot then goes to a man wearing the mask robbing a shop, before switching to the government officials discussing the topic one of them says "this is exactly what he wants" before the shot cuts back to the man in the shop who says "anarchy in the UK". these two events are unrelated but by
putting them side by side it makes it feel as if the robber is ending the sentence of the government official. the next main use is when the official is speaking of his trip to lark hill, he says "it was as if i could see the whole thing, one long chain of events" the shot then goes to V with many many dominos layed out, showing that one thing has led to another and being a physical representation of the long chain of events that had just been mentioned in the narrative.
"it was like a perfect pattern layed out in front of me, and i realised that we are all part of it"
is a quotation taken from the montage. the quote is spoken over the top of a shot of Vs dominos showing juxtaposition between the narrative and the dominos. there is no link between the two but we start to see the dominos as the perfect pattern and we make the link that every domino must fall for them to work linking it too the "we are all part of it" piece of the quotation.
"someone will do something stupid" is spoken by the official as the shot changes to a police officer shoots a young girl in a V mask. This makes us see the stupid act he just predicted as this shooting. "and then" is the last dialogue used before V is seen flicking over the dominos, this makes us feel that V is in control and has the power. the shots then switch between riots in the city and Vs dominos falling.
this is the most impressive use of juxtaposition as the two scenes are completely unrelated yet we start to see them as representative of each other. the dominos falling, being representative of the order falling and anarchy taking over.
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
V for Vendetta and Psycho Shower Scenes Comparison
V for
Vendetta and Psycho both have shower scenes in which somebody is murdered but
due to the types of shots used, and the characters in the showers they have
very different feels and different effects on the viewer.
Firstly starting
with psycho the majority of the shots used are close ups of the woman in the
shower, this allows us see her facial expressions before she is attacked. The
close ups also make the viewer feel as if they are in the shower with her immediately
creating a sense of unease as it is supposed to be her private place and you
feel as if you are invading. Extreme close-ups are also used at various times
such as when she screams there is an extreme close up of her mouth and also
once she has died there is an extreme close up of her eye, showing its blank
dead stare.
The clip also makes use of high angle shots showing her lack of
power, the higher angle could also be seen as the point of view of the killer showing
his dominance over her.
However the
V for Vendetta shower scene is very different, his shower is much larger than
the one in psycho, and is filmed as a mid-close up which makes you feel as if
you are further away and therefore less invasive of his personal/private space.
Also as he is male you feel as if it is much more acceptable for you the viewer
to be in there, than it was with the woman in the psycho shower scene. The mid-close
up allows you to see the televisions on the wall; by showing these it eases
tension in the room because it feels as if he is not alone.
Much different to
that of psycho were you feel like something is going to happen the whole time.
A racking shot is also used when we see the reflection of V in the television. We
see him faintly but then the racking shot pulls focus too him, making him the
clear image and almost making his reflection feel more powerful than the
physical body of the man in the room.
When V is about to kill the commander a
close up of V’s face is filmed from a low angle, showing that he is standing
above the commander making him the dominant, more powerful character, the close
up also emphasises his mask and how his facial expression can’t change whatever
he is doing, adding a sense of mystery. Also when the commander is on the floor
there is lots of lead room showing that he is looking up speaking across to V
who is off scene.
Saturday, 29 September 2012
Sequel for 'In Time'
25 Word Sequel for 'In Time'
by Martin Stewart.
Shutter Island, A Meaningful Film for Study.
I have chosen the film Shutter Island as a meaningful film for study. The film revolves around a man named Teddy who visits an institute for the criminally insane to find a missing patient, however as the film goes on you start too doubt the real reasons why he has been sent to the island. Many complex issues are uncovered and he is told that he has actually been a patient at the institute for 2 years and him being a Marshall was just a fantasy created in his head. The film ends with him being walked off to be lobotomised. The film leaves you confused as too what was the truth, whether he actually was a Marshall and the doctors were lying too him or if he was actually a patient as they said. The film is much more complex and detailed than the brief summary I just made but I cannot go into the detail as this is only a short review.
I would class
this film as psychological thriller, I think it is worthy of being studied as
it is a very complex film and is a shining example of what all thrillers should
be. You simply cannot look away from the screen because missing any single
conversation in the film could cause you too not understand what is going on.
The film being set on an isolated island for the insane immediately sets the
mystery associated with thrillers, and the film has more plot twists than
nearly any other I have seen giving much too study.
The films themes are hide too define, it touches on
the theme of identity because we are unsure about whom the character actually
is, but it also has a strong deceit orientated theme as you don’t know who too
trust at the end of the film. The main character “Teddy” could have been
deceiving us all film or the doctors could have been deceiving him. If “Teddy’s”
theory was correct then the government were also deceiving inmates and the
public about what happens on certain areas of the island. Any of these themes
can be explored in extensive detail, making it a good film to study.
The characters are very effective as it is much more
complex than too just have “good character/s” and “bad character/s”. Due to the
storyline we do not know who to trust or which side is actually working for
good. The doctors appear to be creepy and shady throughout the film but if
their version of events that teddy is actually a patient are true then you can
understand why they refused to give him access to the patients records etc. Making
an action that caused you to dislike them earlier in the film seems perfectly
logical. The same goes for Teddy, we support him throughout the film as we see
everything from his perspective but even when we do believe he is a Marshall
some of his actions are questionable such as when he severely beats an inmate
that attacks him.
In conclusion I feel the general complexity of this
film would make it very good to study, it ticks all of the correct boxes of
what is required by a thriller but also gives so many possible areas to study. I
would recommend the film to anybody but would recommend you watch it on your
own as it is easy to get lost as to what is happening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)